Frederick S. Frei

experienced

Image of a gavel
Straight Talk® is good business
{photo}
1350 I Street, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202.662.3049
Fax: 202.662.2739
Image of a vault

focused

{ Simplified Chinese Bio Link } { Traditional Chinese Bio Link }
{photo}

Frederick S. Frei

Senior Partner

Washington, DC Office
1350 I Street, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005
Phone: 202.662.3049
Fax: 202.662.2739

Fred Frei is an experienced IP litigator and specializes in patent litigation. He has been litigating IP cases for more than 35 years, has tried many patent cases and has first chaired numerous others that resulted in either favorable settlements or summary judgment. Fred has litigated in state and federal courts, including bankruptcy court, throughout the country and at the International Trade Commission. Fred, a registered patent attorney, has been involved with the patent system for more than 40 years, including five years as a Patent Examiner with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  

His IP litigation experience spans patents, trademarks and copyrights and electrical, chemical and mechanical technologies. For example, Fred’s representations have included pharmaceutical and nutritional supplements, cosmetics, medical devices, chemical sensors, optical sensors, food products, solar cells, coolant systems, packaging products, optical disc products and players, plastic products and plastic molding processes and apparatus, road-milling equipment, catalytic converters, electronic commerce, thin-screen monitors, equipment used to irradiate the U.S. mail, power converters, and ground fault circuit interrupters.

Fred was the lead patent trial counsel for the pioneer patent covering all modern-day optical discs (e.g., CDs and CD-ROMS). After a trial which confirmed its validity and where its claims were determined to cover the industry standard discs, the patent ultimately had 140 licensees, including the largest electronics and music companies in the world. Fred has been on trial teams composed solely of patent attorneys and trial teams where there was a mix of commercial litigators and patent attorneys. 

His litigation experience began after completion of his clerkship for the Chief Judge of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to IP cases, he has obtained favorable judgments in an assortment of petroleum price control cases for one of the world's largest oil companies and in contract, antitrust, franchise and fraud cases. For several years, he was responsible for the day-to-day activities, representing a major petroleum company, on the largest case ever filed—the FTC oil industry divestiture case filed against the world's eight largest oil companies. Fred has also represented individuals and companies in federal grand jury investigations involving mail and wire fraud, price fixing and bribery of state officials. Fred's first litigation victory still stands today as the only case where a federal appellate court invalidated a Department of Energy price control regulation on the grounds of lack of statutory authority. 

Fred’s practice also includes counseling relating to the creation, protection, management and exploitation of intellectual property assets, including acquisitions, sales and licensing. He has extensive experience in rendering patentability, validity, infringement and enforceability opinions and in conducting product clearance studies.

Representative Experience

  • ITC Section 337 Investigation (Certain motion-sensitive sound effects devices and image display devices and components and products containing same, Inv. No.337-TA-2799)
  • WiAV Solutions LLC v. Motorola Mobility, Inc. (E.D. Va). Representation of defendant in patent infringement case relating to sound encoding for cell phones.
  • Adrain v. NDI Technologies, Inc. (M.D. Fla.). Representation of defendants in patent infringement case relating to license plate recognition system.
  • Technical Witts, Inc. v. Skynet Electronic Co., Ltd. (Fed. Cir. 2010). Representation of defendant-appellee in appeal in patent infringement case involving power converters.
  • Wyers v. Master Lock Co. (Fed. Cir. 2009). Representation of defendant-appellant in appeal in patent infringement case involving locks.
  • Orion IP, LLC v. Hyundai Motor America (Fed. Cir. 2009). Representation of plaintiff-appellee in patent infringement case involving computer-assisted sales method.
  • ITEQ Corp. v. Isola USA Corp. (D. Ariz.). Representation of plaintiff-counterclaim defendant in patent infringement case relating to resin compositions used to manufacture printed circuit boards.
  • McCormick & Co., Inc. v. Weatherchem Corp. (D.Md.). Representation of the defendant in a trademark and unfair competition case relating to grinder bottles for pepper and other similar items.
  • ITC Section 337 Investigation: (Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Shanghai Meihao Electric, Inc.) (2007). Representation of the respondent in an investigation involving ground fault circuit interrupters.
  • Technical Witts, Inc. v. Skynet Electronic Co., Ltd., Skynet Electronic Corp. (D.Ariz.). Representation of the defendant in this patent infringement action relating to power converters.
  • B-50.com, LLC v. Xformity, Inc. (N.D.Texas). Lead counsel for the alleged infringer in a patent infringement case involving a point of sale reporting system using the Internet.
  • The SCO Group, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corporation (D. Utah). Lead IP counsel for The SCO Group, Inc. in a case involving the UNIX and LINUX operating systems. The case involved three patent counterclaims filed by IBM and copyright infringement and contract claims against IBM arising out of IBM's source code contributions to LINUX.
  • Gateway Plastics, Inc. f/k/a Glendale Plastics, Inc. v. Weatherchem Corporation (E.D. Wis.). Lead IP counsel for the alleged infringer/counterclaim-plaintiff in a case involving three patented closure devices.
  • Ion Beam Applications S A, et al. v. The Titan Corporation, et al. (C.D. Calif.) (irradiation system for food, medical devices and mail)
  • Monster Cable Products, Inc. v. Lightning Audio, Inc. (N.D. Cal.) (utility and design patents and trade dress)
  • Dr. Abulkalam M. Shamsuddin, et al. v. PharmWest, Inc. (D. Md.) (nutritional supplements)
  • DiscoVision Associates v. Disc Manufacturing, Inc., 25 F. Supp.2d 301 (D. Del. 1998) (optical disc patents)
  • Disctronics Texas, Inc. v. Sony Corp. (N. D. Tex.) (antitrust action relating to optical disc patents and licensing)
  • DiscoVision Associates v. Technicolor Videocassette, Inc. (D. Del.) (optical disc patents)
  • Linear Dynamics, Inc. v. A. H. Harris & Sons and Koch Materials Company (D. N. J.) (bridge joints)
  • A.T. Plastics v. Tyco International, Ltd. (D. Mass.) (roofing materials)
  • Miratech, Inc. v. Johnson Matthey Inc. (N.D. Okla.) (catalytic converters)
  • DiscoVision Associates v. Nimbus Records Limited (W.D. Va.) (optical disc patents)
  • Rovers, B.V. v. Wallach Surgical Devices, Inc. (D. Conn.) (medical devices)

Publications

Events

Speaker

Panel Member

Guest Panelist - "Information Technology Report: Intellectual Property," WMAL Radio (December 1999)

TEACHING ACTIVITIES

Adjunct Faculty

Instructor

Practices

Education

Admissions

Affiliations